What Is The Key Approach To Long Term Success Of Offsite?

If there is single word you can guarantee will more likely come up in a conversation while discussing about the construction company in London, it is 'offsite'.

The profile of offsite has never been higher but despite it being far from a new concept, there remains huge discussion about how the business can more effectively deliver what would appear to be its potential.

Looking ahead it seems to be certain that PMV will become the prevailing terminology while discussing offsite.

It was acknowledged that there should be an industry-wide agreed definition and a calculation to make PMV truly meaningful.

The lack of data was highlighted as a typical barrier across the cultural change necessary to completely embrace the opportunities of offsite. As one specialist started, we are informed that MMC is 30% quicker, but quicker than what?

This lack of data was featured as a potential barrier to the social change necessary to completely embrace the chances of offsite. Hearts and minds should have been persuaded and that would happen when it was clear what the tangible and quantifiable benefits were.

In few sectors, for example, education there is little argument about the advantages of offsite. The results are comparable if worse than those delivered by means of more traditional strategies.

It is pioneering sectors like education that plays a crucial role in taking the construction company in london forward with regards to adapting and integrating offsite in light of the fact that the minimum PMV requirements for future public systems are sure to increase, leaving behind those that have not adapted to the new reality.

A Standardized Approach

The clear consensus from the discussion was that a standardized way to deal with PMV will be crucial in construction's continuous advancement if it is going to capture the efficiencies the industry so desperately needs, despite the fact that it isn't the only change that should overcome.

Another was that marginally counter intuitively, the cost of accepting the opportunities of offsite can be restrictive in fact it means more investment in consultants in advance when the funding of multiple projects is weighted towards after a project has achieved planning.

Engaging with contractors at a far prior stage than is frequently the case is also significant so the offsite opportunities can be properly understood from the outset and become part of the initial design process rather than considered retrospectively, adding extra cost and lessening the efficiency premium.

What appears to be clear is that for the guarantee of offsite to be realized, a clear strategy with realistic goals should be set up with a top down order that will explode the myths around offsite and drive the fundamental cultural change that will fuel this latest stage in the evolution of our industry.

There is a lot to do but there will undoubtedly come when we are done talking about offsite in the construction company in london, it will simply be the way we get things done.